ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Root Canal Location Accuracy: Dynamic Navigation Verses Freehand in Extracted Human Molars - A Randomized In Vitro Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the accuracy, instrumentation time, and success rate of three dynamic navigation systems (DNSs)-infrared-active (IA), infrared-passive (IP), and visible light-passive (VP)-with freehand (FH) operation in locating root canals of maxillary and mandibular molars, providing a basis for technique selection in complex endodontic treatments.
methodsNinety-six extracted human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 24/group): IA-DNS, IP-DNS, VP-DNS, and FH (control). Specimens were embedded in plaster and scanned with CBCT (0.3 mm slice thickness). In DNS groups, fiducial markers enabled real-time tracking of the bur position. The FH group used a microscope with CBCT reference. Recorded parameters included: angular deviation (°), three-dimensional deviations at entry and target points (mm), instrumentation time (s), tooth structure loss (mm³), and success rate of canal location. Data were analysed using ANOVA and chi-square tests (α = 0.05).
resultsDNS demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than FH. Angular deviations in DNS groups (IA: 0.64° ± 0.34°, IP: 0.59° ± 0.32°, VP: 0.63° ± 0.24°) were 94.3% to 94.7% lower than FH (11.03° ± 4.70°) (P < .001). Three-dimensional deviations at entry (0.57-0.70 mm) and target (0.59-0.80 mm) were significantly smaller than FH (1.64 mm and 1.26 mm, respectively; P < .001). Tooth structure loss in DNS groups (9.79-11.03 mm³) was reduced by 26.8% to 34.6% compared to FH (14.98 mm³; P < .001). No significant difference in operative time was observed among groups (176-183 s, P > .05). Success rate was significantly higher in DNS groups (99.54%, 215/216) than FH (93.06%, 67/72; P = .004). No significant differences were observed among the three DNS types for any parameter.
conclusionDNS significantly enhanced accuracy of root canal location in molars, reducing angular deviation by >94%, minimizing tooth structure loss by >26%, and increasing success rate to 99.5%. Performance was consistent across different optical principles and signal mechanisms, supporting DNS as a viable option for precise management of calcified canals and other nonsurgical endodontic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.