Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42335252›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of managed care2026

Cost of behavioral messaging interventions for cardiovascular medication adherence.

Dana R Fletcher, Lisa M Sandy, Joy Waughtal, Cole Hoffman, Sylvie Novins-Montague, Patrick Hosokawa, Pamela N Peterson, Larry A Allen, Sheana Bull, P Michael Ho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of managed care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03973931 (Personalized Patient Data and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Adherence to Chronic Cardiovascular Medications), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03973931 nacompletednot on this map

Personalized Patient Data and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Adherence to Chronic Cardiovascular Medications (The Nudge Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2023Enrolled9,501ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Adherence, Medication, Medication Adherence, Diabetes MellitusArmsNudge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dana R FletcherEvida Research Consulting Inc, 13880 W 8th Ave, Golden, CO 80401. Email: dana.fletcher@evidaresearch.com.
Lisa M SandyAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Joy WaughtalAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Cole HoffmanColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
Sylvie Novins-MontagueAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Patrick HosokawaAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Pamela N PetersonDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Larry A AllenDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Sheana BullColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
P Michael HoDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Personalized Patient data and behavioral nudges to improve adherence to chronic cardiovascular medicationsUH3HL144163 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ALLEN, LARRY ALEXANDER, BULL, SHEANA S · 2019 to 2022
$5.7M
Personalized Patient data and behavioral nudges to improve adherence to chronic cardiovascular medicationsUG3HL144163 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BULL, SHEANA S, HO, P. MICHAEL · 2018 to 2018
$789k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL144163NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL144163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMobile health (mHealth) interventions have promise as low-cost tools promoting behavioral change. We evaluated the implementation and maintenance costs of 3 text messaging strategies aimed at improving cardiovascular medication adherence. STUDY

designThe Nudge Study (NCT03973931) was a randomized pragmatic trial that evaluated prescription refill adherence across 3 health systems. We estimated costs over the 4-year study period.

methodsAfter adjusting for inflation to 2023 US$, we calculated net non-research-related labor and materials costs in total and by The Nudge Study arm, assigning usual care a $0 cost. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using observed cost; payoffs of the median reduction in number of gap days without medications; and the study's published rates of death, hospitalization, and emergency visits.

resultsProgram start-up costs were similar across the 3 health care systems (mean [SD], $2954 [$352]). Across the 53 months of the study and comprising start-up, implementation, and program delivery phases, the mean monthly cost to deliver all messaging strategies was $3949 and 1430 unique patients on average received any type of message monthly, resulting in an estimated cost of $2.76 per patient per month. ICER values were low, and there were no significant differences across treatment strategy or outcome.

conclusionsProviding medication adherence support via mobile messaging may be a low-cost solution for some hospital systems.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDrug MonitoringMedication AdherenceText MessagingAdherence InterventionsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42335252
PMCPMC13660525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.