ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Mechanism-Informed Rules Tunably Balance Novelty and Feasibility of Predicted Enzymatic Reactions.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymes catalyze reactions with remarkable specificity and can unlock recalcitrant feedstocks that are dilute, complex, and variable in their constituent molecules. While characterized enzymatic reactions cover a wide range of chemistries, there are an undetermined number of cryptic activities for every known one. These cryptic activities can be elicited through rational design, adaptive laboratory evolution, and increasingly, generative models of proteins. However, prior to tuning a catalyst, one must efficiently predict viable novel reactions. In this work, we leverage the growing amount of mechanistic enzyme information, specifically the Mechanism and Catalytic Site Atlas, to construct a set of reaction rules that can meet this demand. By explicitly utilizing mechanistic information, the rule sets developed here more accurately identify molecular structures required for catalysis compared to existing curated and heuristically constructed rules. The 899 Distilled rules are constructed directly from characterized mechanisms and recapitulate 62.5% of atom-mapped reactions from Rhea. The Learned rule set is generated from a classifier trained on structural patterns putatively required for catalytic mechanisms. The Learned rules recapitulate all atom-mapped Rhea reactions and precisely predict mechanism-required atoms (ROC-AUC = 0.98). Additionally, our Learned rules exhibit a more favorable trade-off between novelty and feasibility and provide users with fine-grained control over this trade-off. The rules are compatible with all SMARTS-based reaction network expansion and retrosynthesis software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42335221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.