ArticlePloS one2026
The Andean-Amazonian and Mesoamerican Bioeconomy: A new paradigm for productivity and well-being.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional Total Factor Productivity (TFP) metrics often overlook biophysical limits and the depletion of natural capital. This study proposes an alternative paradigm: the Andean-Amazonian Bioeconomy (AAB), which integrates Georgescu-Roegen's Law of Entropy and ancestral knowledge into an expanded production function. By applying the Malmquist Productivity Index and a Fixed Effects (FE) panel data model, we analyzed a dataset (1995-2024) from six Latin American countries. This approach utilizes the Human Development Index (HDI) as the primary proxy for social welfare. The methodology addresses country heterogeneity and multicollinearity, significantly enhancing the model's explanatory power to an Adjusted R2 of 0.695. Our findings reveal a 'Biocultural Paradox': where conservation, often viewed as a cost by traditional income-based metric, emerges as vital investment. Our model demonstrate that the preservation of the biocultural fund- represented here as Biocultural Savings [S]- is a positive and highly significant predictor of social well-being (β = 0.685, p < 0.01), alongside a positive impact from the indigenous population index (β = 0.015, p < 0.1), suggesting that cultural identity plays a foundational role in regional resilience. We conclude that achieving 'Vivir Bien' (Living Well) requires a shift toward indicators that prioritize the biocultural fund -the stock of ancestral knowledge and biodiversity- over mere resource flow. This study provides a scientifically rigorous framework for sustainability policies across the Global South.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.