ArticlePloS one2026
Relationship between Corvis ST tonometry parameters and mean blur rate in the optic nerve head tissue area in healthy eyes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between Corvis ST tonometry parameters and mean blur rate in the optic nerve head tissue area (MBR-T) in healthy eyes. Corneal biomechanical properties and MBR-T were measured in 100 eyes from 56 healthy participants in Japan using Corvis ST tonometry and laser speckle flowgraphy, respectively. Axial length, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure were also recorded. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to evaluate the associations between corneal biomechanical properties and MBR-T. Model selection was performed using the second-order bias-corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). The optimal predictive model for MBR-T was as follows: MBR-T = 21.1607 (intercept) - 1.6317 × Sex (Male) - 4.8626 × A2 deformation amplitude - 5.7932 × HC deformation amplitude (AICc = 409.9). In healthy eyes, greater corneal deformability was associated with lower MBR-T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.