ArticlePloS one2026
Bridging the biomass data gap: A literature-based Length-Weight Relationship framework for estimating representative dry weights of freshwater invertebrates in Korean rivers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Representative species weight is a critical ecological index for modeling, vulnerability assessment, and toxicity prediction, yet scientifically validated data for aquatic invertebrates remain limited. To address this gap, we present the first literature-based strategy to estimate and validate representative dry weights of freshwater invertebrate species in Korean rivers using Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs). Species length and dry weight records were compiled from domestic field guides, while dry weight records were compiled from both domestic and global literature. LWR coefficients (a and b) were then calculated at genus, family, and order levels and preprocessed under control conditions. Among the taxonomic levels tested, averaging genus-level coefficients yielded the highest concordance with field-measured dry weights (R2 = 0.6633, n = 240), outperforming broader taxonomic levels. Furthermore, a logarithmic correlation analysis confirmed that greater numbers of LWR sources improve predictive accuracy, particularly at the genus level. Based on this optimal strategy, representative dry weights were estimated for 563 taxa. This methodology fills a critical data gap by leveraging existing literature to generate reliable species-specific weight indices without additional field measurements. Our approach provides a quantitative foundation for biomass estimation in data-limited freshwater ecosystems and supports improved ecological modeling, conservation planning, and machine learning-based impact prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.