Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42335048›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The association of competitiveness and sociodemographics with imposter phenomenon in a cohort of sport science college undergraduates.

Zachary Yukio Kerr, Ethan P Sgarlata, Justin D Dennis, Jeffrey A Turner, Aliza K Nedimyer, Jimikaye B Courtney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachary Yukio KerrDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-1259
Ethan P SgarlataDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Justin D DennisDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5085-1298
Jeffrey A TurnerDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-2667
Aliza K NedimyerDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jimikaye B CourtneyDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4609-4984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImposter phenomenon is where individuals experience continued feelings of self-doubt, with fears of being exposed as frauds. The intersectionality of different identities related to imposter phenomenon has rarely been examined in sport science student populations. This study examines the prevalence of imposter phenomenon among sport science undergraduate students and explores differences between different sociodemographic groups.

methodsThis secondary analysis study examines 289 undergraduate students in a sport science course at a United States Southeastern university from Spring 2023 to Spring 2025. The Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) measured imposter phenomenon, and the Revised Competitiveness Index (CI-R) examined competitiveness. Multiple linear regression examined associations of imposter phenomenon with sociodemographic variables and competitiveness subscales (enjoyment of competition, contentiousness).

resultsOverall, 52.6% of students reported frequent or intense imposter characteristics (CIPS mean±SD = 62.1 ± 12.9). In the final model (adjusted r² = 26.7%), significant predictors included: being a senior versus first-year/sophomore (b = 5.6; 95%CI: 2.1, 9.2); and higher contentiousness (10%-increase-b = -1.5; 95%CI: -2.0, -0.9). Interaction terms included gender identity × first generation student status (p = 0.02) and varsity athlete × enjoyment of competition (p = 0.06). Among first generation students, those not identifying as men had higher imposter phenomenon than men (b = 7.4; 95%CI: 4.2, 10.6); among non-first generation students, no differences were found (b = -1.3; 95%CI: -7.9, 5.2). Among varsity athletes, for every 10% increase in the enjoyment of competition subscale, imposter phenomenon scores decreased by 2.1 (95%CI: -4.4, 0.1); among non-varsity athletes, enjoyment of competition was not associated with imposter phenomenon scores (10%-increase-b = 0.1; 95%CI: -0.7, 0.8). DISCUSSION: Over half of the sample noted frequent and intense feelings of imposter phenomenon. Helping students consider their capabilities and potential for future success, despite academic setbacks, should be considered in resources to mitigate imposter phenomenon. Resources throughout a student's college tenure can help address imposter phenomenon at various stages of academic and professional development.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorSelf ConceptSportsStudentsAcademiaAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42335048
PMCPMC13289916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.