ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2026
Mental health and psychosocial support during ongoing armed conflict: position paper of the Global Collaboration on Traumatic Stress.
Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by ongoing armed conflict: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this position paper, we highlight the urgent need for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) systems adapted to the realities of populations affected by ongoing armed conflicts and, therefore, continuous traumatic stress. Existing frameworks largely address post-disaster contexts, offering limited guidance for settings of sustained threat. Drawing on an extensive literature search, a scoping review on MHPSS during ongoing armed conflicts, and clinical experience, we outline key mental health challenges during ongoing armed conflict and identify a critical gap in scalable, culturally responsive interventions. Based on this analysis, we propose recommendations across policy, training, staff care, and research domains. We advocate for trauma-informed, rights-based, participatory, and adaptive care systems that strengthen local capacity, integrate measurement-based approaches, and utilize digital and transdiagnostic stepped-care models. Through this paper, we aim to catalyse research, inspire innovation, and encourage global collaboration to more effectively support the mental health of communities living under the enduring strain of armed conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.