ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2026
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment for birth trauma: a scoping review.
Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A traumatic childbirth can have negative consequences for mothers, as well as their children and partners. While eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is recommended in clinical guidelines as a treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following childbirth, the specific application of EMDR for this population remains unclear. This scoping review aims to explore the extent of existing literature on the use of EMDR in the treatment of birth trauma. This review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included sources of evidence in which individuals or partners received EMDR treatment for birth trauma. Databases searched included PsycInfo, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, from inception of the database until approximately August 2025. Grey literature was also searched. Sources were limited to English-language publications. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from eligible quantitative and qualitative sources. Data were analysed in a descriptive and thematic manner. Data extraction included the sources' characteristics, outcomes, and results. Findings are presented in tabular and narrative formats. Twenty-nine sources of evidence were included, comprising randomized control trials, qualitative research, systematic reviews, and grey literature. Overall, EMDR showed promise in treating birth trauma, although the diversity of the evidence type and methodological design varied. This scoping review indicates that EMDR may be a promising intervention for birth trauma. However, the current evidence base is limited and heterogeneous in terms of study design type and outcome measures used. Further research is needed that includes long-term data, qualitative designs, diverse ethnicities, and the perspectives of partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.