SynthesisDermatology and therapy2026
Modalities of Combined Medical and Surgical Treatment in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.
Synthesis in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts that lead to significant morbidity and impaired quality of life. Although both biologic therapies and surgical interventions are effective when used independently, their combined use has gained increasing attention. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining immunomodulatory therapy with surgical procedures in HS. A conceptual framework was applied that distinguished three modalities of combined treatment according to the temporal relationship between biologic therapy and surgery: pre-biologic surgery, post-induction surgery, and concomitant approaches. A comprehensive search identified eight eligible studies, including 508 patients. Most studies were retrospective and of low methodological quality. Across studies, combination therapy (particularly with adalimumab, secukinumab, or bimekizumab) was generally associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to biologic monotherapy, including higher response rates (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR]; 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 [IHS4-55]), greater reductions in pain, disease flares, and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Safety profiles were comparable between groups, with no consistent increase in postoperative complications or serious adverse events. However, key outcomes such as wound healing time were poorly reported. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, treatment protocols, and timing of interventions limited comparability and precluded meta-analysis. Overall, the available evidence preliminarily supports combined medical and surgical treatment as a potentially beneficial and well-tolerated strategy for moderate-to-severe HS, in line with current expert practice. However, given the low quality and substantial heterogeneity of the included studies, these findings should be considered exploratory and require confirmation in higher-quality prospective studies that adopt standardized definitions of combination therapy and report wound healing as a core outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.