ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Validation of the three-level hepatectomy complexity classification and its AI application in robotic liver surgery.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic liver surgery (RLS) is expanding in recent years. Complication prediction is crucial for postoperative outcomes. Traditional MIS scores are poorly studied in RLS, and conventional statistics often oversimplify the multifactorial and interrelated nature of these complications. This study aimed to evaluate the three-level complexity Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) classification in RLS and assess its integration into an AI algorithm to predict major complications. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients underwent RLS. Surgical complexity was stratified into grades I (low complexity), II (intermediate), and III (high). The cumulative incidence rate and conditional probability of postoperative complication and risk factors for complication ≥ Clavien-Dindo grade II were assessed. The prediction model was developed by training/testing a machine learning (ML) algorithm after feature selection with uni-multivariate analysis. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and model accuracy. We analyzed 1,045 patients who underwent RLS, classifying them into three complexity levels: Grade I (n = 581), Grade II (n = 267), and Grade III (n = 109). Significant differences were observed in intra- and postoperative outcomes across the three grades. Multivariate analysis identified ASA score (HR 2.1, p = 0.02), number of lesions (HR 1.8, p = 0.001), and operative time (OR 1, p = 0.004) as key predictors of complications. Associated with the three-level complexity classification, the Neural Network showed the best performance with AUC (0.653) and a precision of 0.996. Three-level complexity IMM classification is a useful tool in RLS for predicting intra-postoperative outcomes. It can be integrated into the Neural Network algorithm to predict major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.