ReviewUpdates in surgery2026
Management of lactational and non-lactational breast abscesses: an evidence-based framework to support breast surgeon decision-making.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast abscesses are common benign surgical conditions, particularly among lactating women but they are increasingly recognized in non-lactational settings. Despite their clinical and psychosocial impact, management remains heterogeneous and lacks widely accepted guidelines. A structured narrative review (2012-2024) was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Evidence from randomized trials, observational studies and systematic reviews was combined with the clinical experience of a high-volume tertiary Breast Unit to develop a multidisciplinary, ultrasound-based management algorithm. Across seven studies (including randomized trials, comparative studies, and a meta-analysis), US-NA demonstrated high resolution rates (85-92%) with shorter healing times and improved patient-reported outcomes compared with I&D. Surgical drainage remains the preferred treatment for collections > 5 cm, multiloculated or recurrent abscesses, particularly in non-lactational cases. Breast surgeons play a pivotal role in diagnosis, intervention selection and coordination of multidisciplinary care. The proposed algorithm provides a reproducible, evidence-based tool to standardize management. Multicenter, surgeon-led studies are needed to support international guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.