ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Current issues in clinical staging of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-a European snapshot survey.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a rare cancer for which clinical diagnosis and staging remain challenging. To gain an understanding of the status for clinical staging in pCCA, a pan-European survey was undertaken. A multidisciplinary group from two centres (Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) identified issues relevant to the diagnosis and staging of pCCA. A snapshot survey was designed, targeted to clinicians across Europe. The survey covered seven areas: centralization, multidisciplinary team (MDT) review, transplantation, imaging, biliary drainage, cholangioscopy and staging laparoscopy. The electronic survey was circulated through the European Cholangiocarcinoma Network. Clinicians representing 47 hospitals from 20 European countries responded. A majority of centres (n = 33, 70%) were part of a health system with centralized pCCA care. Regardless of the type of pCCA care system, MDT review was almost uniformly available (n = 44, 94%). While more than two thirds of centres had MDT-representation of subspecialized physicians, only a minority had a nurse represented. Recommendations for primary route of biliary drainage were divided (51% endoscopic, 40% percutaneous). Availability of evaluation for transplantation differed between centralized (64%, 58% with neoadjuvant therapy) and decentralized pCCA care systems (28%, 14% with neoadjuvant therapy, P = 0.02). This pan-European survey presents a current outlook on the status of diagnostic pathways, multidisciplinary care and therapy options for patients with pCCA, reflecting both important similarities and contrasts across Europe. Recommendations for primary route of biliary drainage were divided, and access to evaluation for transplantation was associated with centralized pCCA care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.