ReviewCNS drugs2026
Isoform-Specific NaV Modulation in Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Promise, Limitations, and a Clinical Agenda.
Review in CNS drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is highly prevalent and functionally disabling yet remains largely refractory to current treatments. Isoform-specific modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV), particularly NaV1.8, has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce nociceptor hyperexcitability. The recent approval of the NaV1.8-selective inhibitor suzetrigine for acute postoperative pain demonstrates the feasibility of highly selective peripheral sodium-channel inhibition, although its indication is currently restricted to acute pain and its relevance for chronic neuropathic conditions remains uncertain. However, painful CIPN is mechanistically heterogeneous, shaped by oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, activation of transient receptor potential channels, axonal degeneration, and central sensitization. These multidimensional pathways raise important questions about whether NaV selectivity alone can provide meaningful benefit in a condition where neuronal hyperexcitability represents only one component of a broader pathophysiological network. Evidence from sodium-channel-targeted analgesics, including the partial efficacy of NaV1.7 inhibitors and the functional redundancy among NaV1.7, NaV1.8, and NaV1.9, further underscores the limitations of monotherapy approaches. This Current Opinion argues that isoform-specific NaV modulation should be embedded within a broader translational framework. Priorities include mechanistic phenotyping aligned with chemotherapy class, integration of functional and molecular biomarkers, and adoption of patient-centered endpoints. Furthermore, multimodal strategies combining NaV modulators with agents targeting oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, immune activation, or cytoskeletal injury-alongside mechanism-based rehabilitation and neuromodulation-may offer more realistic therapeutic benefit. By situating NaV modulation within these multidimensional strategies and incorporating pharmacogenetic insights into NaV variants associated with painful neuropathies, the field may move beyond technological promise toward interventions that meaningfully improve outcomes for patients living with painful CIPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334794What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.