ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026
Access, Equity and Ethical Challenges in Assisted Reproductive Technologies in India: An Empirical Bioethics Analysis.
Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have expanded rapidly in India, raising significant ethical and distributive justice concerns relating to accessibility, affordability and reproductive healthcare governance. Despite growing scholarly attention to ART regulation, empirical evidence examining public perceptions of access, perceived equity barriers and ethical governance within the Indian context remains limited. This study addresses this gap through an empirical bioethics analysis of public perceptions regarding ART accessibility and governance in India. A cross-sectional survey of 560 respondents from urban, semi-urban and rural settings was conducted using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons. The findings reveal significant geographic disparities in access to ART services, with urban respondents reporting substantially greater access than semi-urban and rural respondents (F = 35.040, p < 0.001). Descriptive findings further indicate moderate levels of awareness and regulatory trust alongside lower perceptions of access and greater perceived equity barriers. The study highlights the continuing influence of structural inequality on reproductive healthcare accessibility in India and underscores the need for policy interventions aimed at improving equitable access, institutional accountability and inclusive reproductive healthcare governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.