ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
Winner takes all? Understanding the impact of energy transition on employment under the constraint of China's carbon peak target.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality requires not only reducing emissions but also managing the macroeconomic side effects of the energy transition. This study examines employment reallocation as a carbon transition management problem rather than as a conventional labor market performance issue. We develop an integrated multi-regional input-output (MRIO) and multi-objective optimization model to simulate how China's carbon peak constrained energy transition reshapes formal labor demand across 42 sectors and 31 provinces. The novelty of this study lies in linking a theoretical mechanism of capital biased energy transition with a detailed interregional production network, thereby identifying where the social costs of decarbonization are likely to concentrate. Our results show that although the transition increases aggregate employment, it generates a clear "winner takes all" pattern. Employment gains are captured mainly by economically developed coastal regions and high value added service and power related sectors, while less developed inland and resource dependent regions face severe losses. Shanxi, a typical coal dependent province, could lose nearly 10% of formal employment opportunities, and job growth in renewables is insufficient to fully offset losses in traditional fossil fuel and power industries. These findings provide policy relevant evidence for carbon management by showing that carbon peak pathways must be evaluated not only by emission outcomes but also by their spatial and sectoral employment risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.