ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026
Implicit learning of social information in contextual cueing.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human attention is often guided by contextual cues that signal where or how to focus in complex environments. Research on object contextual cueing has largely emphasized spatial regularities, but it remains unclear whether socially meaningful information can also provide such guidance. Across three experiments using face stimuli, we examined whether social cues can serve as contextual cues independently of spatial arrangements. In all experiments, participants searched for a target face among distractor faces, with spatial configurations fully randomized on every trial, and contextual information was defined by different types of social mappings. In Experiment 1, the cue was defined by consistent associations between a target identity and a specific set of distractor identities. In Experiment 2, the cue was the overall mood, quantified as the ratio of angry to happy faces. In Experiment 3, the cue was relational information, specifically facing-direction patterns within pairs of profile-view faces. Performance under Consistent Mapping conditions was compared with Variable Mapping conditions, in which these social regularities changed across trials. Bayesian analyses revealed reliable contextual cueing effects across all three experiments, with faster responses under Consistent than Variable Mapping conditions. The effect was strongest in Experiment 2, suggesting that global social cues may be encoded more efficiently than local relational cues. Post-experiment awareness tests indicated minimal explicit knowledge and no reliable association between awareness measures and contextual cueing. Together, these findings suggest that socially meaningful relational structure can provide stable predictive information that supports object-based contextual learning even when spatial regularities are absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.