Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334684›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Clinical results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus conventional approach in volar locking plate fixation for closed distal radius fractures under wide-awake local anesthesia.

Suphasan Keatisuwan, Jaruwat Vechasilp, Lertkong Nitiwarangkul, Natthamon Suwannaprom, Woraphon Jaroenporn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suphasan KeatisuwanDepartment of Orthopaedic, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. mdsuphasan@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5474-9866
Jaruwat VechasilpDepartment of Orthopaedic, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lertkong NitiwarangkulDepartment of Orthopaedic, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthamon SuwannapromOffice of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council, Bangkok, Thailand.
Woraphon JaroenpornDepartment of Orthopaedic, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been introduced as an alternative technique for distal radius fracture fixation, aiming to minimize surgical trauma while preserving soft tissue integrity. The Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) method enables intraoperative functional assessment and early active wrist motion. Comparative evidence between MIPO and conventional volar plate fixation performed under WALANT remains limited.

methodsA single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2021 and February 2023. Sixty-six patients with isolated closed distal radius fractures were randomized to MIPO (n = 33) or conventional open volar locking plate fixation via a modified Henry approach (n = 33) under WALANT. The primary outcome was first postoperative day pain measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included morphine usage, QuickDASH score, grip and pinch strength, range of motion, operative time, aesthetic score, radiographic parameters, and complications. Minimum follow-up was six months.

resultsThe MIPO group showed a statistically lower POD1 VAS pain score than the conventional group that was below the minimal clinically important difference and therefore not clinically significant (mean 3.4 [SD 0.96] vs. 4.2 [SD 1.51]; mean difference 0.8, 95% CI 0.2-1.4; p = 0.012). Cosmetic outcomes were higher in the MIPO group (mean aesthetic score 3.3 vs. 2.8). Morphine consumption, QuickDASH scores, grip and pinch strength, range of motion, operative duration, and radiographic outcomes were similar between groups, whereas intraoperative fluoroscopy use was higher in the MIPO group. All patients achieved bone union within three months, and no major complications were reported.

conclusionIn this randomized controlled trial, MIPO under WALANT achieved functional, radiographic, and safety outcomes equivalent to conventional volar plate fixation. The statistically lower POD1 pain score in the MIPO group fell below the minimal clinically important difference, indicating no clinically significant difference in early postoperative pain between the two techniques; the only consistent advantages were smaller incisions and better cosmetic scores. MIPO under WALANT is therefore a safe and viable alternative-chosen for its cosmetic benefit and at the cost of greater fluoroscopy use and a steeper learning curve-rather than a clinically superior technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Randomized controlled trial, Therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, ClosedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRadius FracturesWrist FracturesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRange of Motion, ArticularDistal radius fractureMIPOPostoperative painVolar locking plateWALANT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.