Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334670›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026

Factors associated with self-care engagement among oesophageal and gastric cancer survivors: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Kenneth Färnqvist, Sara Färnqvist, Asif Johar, Anna Schandl, Pernilla Lagergren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth FärnqvistSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Blombäcks väg 23, 4th Floor, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara FärnqvistSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Blombäcks väg 23, 4th Floor, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Asif JoharSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Blombäcks väg 23, 4th Floor, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna SchandlSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Blombäcks väg 23, 4th Floor, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pernilla LagergrenSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Blombäcks väg 23, 4th Floor, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. pernilla.lagergren@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-0233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of oesophageal and gastric cancer frequently experience persistent symptoms and functional limitations that affect their health-related quality of life (HRQL). Although self-care is increasingly recognised as a central component of survivorship care, little is known about what determines self-care engagement or whether engagement is associated with better HRQL. This study examined the sociodemographic and healthcare-related variables associated with self-care engagement and explored its association with global quality of life (QOL) in a nationwide cohort.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among individuals diagnosed with oesophageal or gastric cancer in Sweden between 2021 and 2023. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a study-specific questionnaire assessing symptoms and self-care. Self-care engagement was operationalised as the ratio of self-care strategies used to the number of symptoms experienced and categorised into no, moderate, and high. Factors associated with self-care engagement were analysed using multinomial logistic regression, and the association between self-care engagement and global QOL was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical confounders.

resultsOf the 432 respondents, 422 reported at least one symptom and were included in the self-care analysis. One-third of the participants reported no self-care engagement, whereas two-thirds reported moderate or high engagement. Across all models, university education was the strongest and only consistent variable associated with self-care engagement (high vs. no self-care engagement: odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.48-5.42). Neither assignment of a designated contact nurse nor proximity to the treating hospital was associated with self-care engagement. Participants with high self-care engagement had substantially better global QOL than those with moderate or no self-care engagement, with mean differences exceeding 10 points on a 0-100 scale. Global QOL did not differ between the moderate and no self-care groups.

conclusionsSelf-care engagement varies widely among oesophageal and gastric cancer survivors and appears to be influenced by educational level. High self-care engagement is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in global QOL, whereas no or moderate self-care appears insufficient to confer benefits. These findings suggest an equity gap in survivorship care, and future research should explore the development of structured and accessible interventions to enhance self-care capabilities among patients with lower educational attainment.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsEsophageal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSelf CareStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenOesophageal neoplasmQuality of lifeSelf-managementSigns and symptomsStomach neoplasmSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID42334670
PMCPMC13291034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.