Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334653›Full record

SynthesisBrain topography2026

Electroencephalogram for the Diagnosis of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Shu Jing, Zhenwei Dai, You Xin, Xiaoyang Liu, Xuelin Yang, Xin Liu, Jingjie Fan, Yueyun Wang, Lijuan Lai, Zhongai Ouyang and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shu Jing *School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhenwei Dai *Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
You XinSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyang LiuSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuelin YangSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xin LiuSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jingjie FanShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Yueyun WangShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Lijuan LaiShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Zhongai OuyangShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Zhili HanChina Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China. han.zhili@cfau.edu.cn.
Kai LiuShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Guangdong, China. 121857345@qq.com.
Xiaoyou SuSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. suxiaoyou@hotmail.com.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences CAMS 2021-I2M-1-004Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM202211032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a prevalent mental health condition with a significant global burden, yet its diagnosis remains challenging due to the inherent limitations of conventional assessment tools. The electroencephalography (EEG) could be a potential diagnostic modality of depression. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of EEG in depression diagnosis. A systematic search was performed in the major academic databases from inception to January 25, 2025. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the bias of all the included studies. Bivariate random-effect models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve models were used to illustrate the diagnostic performance. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and the Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the possible sources of heterogeneity. A total of 18 studies were included, contributing 58 reported results in total. The diagnostic test accuracy of EEG for depression was high across the studies, as the pooled SEN, SPE, and DOR were 0.939 (95% CI: 0.915-0.957), 0.898 (95% CI: 0.840-0.937), and 137.493 (95% CI: 62.383-303.038), respectively. This study shows that EEG has a good application prospect in depression diagnosis, which could provide a definitive and quantitative reference. However, the quality of evidence in this study is affected by factors such as patient selection bias in the original case-control studies, small sample sizes, and unexplained clinical and statistical heterogeneity, so the findings should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

DepressionElectroencephalographyHumansSensitivity and SpecificityDepressionDiagnostic test accuracyEEGSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.