Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334630›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Abdominal binders versus semi-rigid corsets after open ventral hernia repair: early postoperative tolerance and patient preference in a randomized cross-over study.

Kryspin Mitura, Małgorzata Pajer, Laura Kacprzak, Piotr Niecikowski, Marta Wojcik, Lidia Mitura, Małgorzata Sawicka, Iwona Witowska, Krystian Kisielewski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kryspin Mitura *Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland. chirurgia.siedlce@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2227-4550
Małgorzata Pajer *Department of General Surgery, Hospital in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8233-695X
Laura KacprzakFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.
Piotr NiecikowskiFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.
Marta WojcikDepartment of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Franciszek Raszeja Hospital, Poznan, Poland.
Lidia MituraFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata SawickaDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.
Iwona WitowskaDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.
Krystian KisielewskiDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of abdominal supports after ventral hernia repair remains common practice despite inconsistent evidence and lack of clear recommendations. Concerns persist that more rigid devices may be poorly tolerated in the early postoperative period.

aimTo compare early postoperative patient-reported health state, functional outcomes, global preference, and willingness to recommend an elastic abdominal binder and a semi-rigid corset.

methodsIn this prospective randomized within-subject cross-over study, 23 patients following open sublay repair of large ventral hernias were sequentially fitted with an elastic abdominal binder and a semi-rigid corset on postoperative day 2-3. Each device was worn for approximately three hours during routine postoperative activities. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using VAS and EQ-5D-5 L questionnaires. Global preference and willingness to recommend each device were recorded.

resultsVAS scores were comparable between devices (p = 0.36), indicating no deterioration in perceived health state with corset use. No EQ-5D-5 L domain was rated worse with the corset. Significant improvements were observed for usual activities and anxiety/depression. A majority of patients preferred the corset (69.6%), and significantly more patients recommended it compared to the binder (95.7% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.039).

conclusionsSemi-rigid corsets were not associated with worse early postoperative tolerance and were more frequently preferred and recommended by patients. Early tolerance of semi-rigid supports may influence patient acceptance of postoperative abdominal support strategies, although long-term adherence was not assessed in the present study. These findings challenge the assumption that more rigid supports are poorly tolerated and support considering semi-rigid corsets as a viable option after open ventral hernia repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyPatient PreferenceAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesAbdominal bindersHernia surgeryPatient preferencePostoperative carePostoperative outcomesSemi-rigid corsets

Identifiers

PMID42334630
PMCPMC13290828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.