ArticlePsychological research2026
Context-dependent motor-semantic interactions: evidence from dual-task paradigms in semantic fluency.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embodied cognition theories propose that conceptual knowledge is grounded in sensorimotor experience, but evidence for motor involvement in semantic memory retrieval for natural items remains inconsistent. Across two pre-registered experiments, we investigated whether motor dual-tasks and body posture manipulations affect semantic recall for natural manipulable concepts (fruits) versus non-manipulable concepts (colors) during semantic fluency (SF) tasks. In Experiment 1, 46 young adults performed SF while executing concurrent motor sequences with either upper limbs or lower limbs as control. In Experiment 2, 46 young adults completed the same task while adopting either restricted or unrestricted control postures. Contrary to predictions of interference, Experiment 1 revealed facilitation: participants retrieved fruits significantly faster during upper limbs motor tasks compared to control dual-task, with no effects for the color category. This facilitation affected retrieval speed rather than semantic network structure, suggesting that semantically congruent movement might prime semantic recall, consistent with theories proposing that unbound motor feature activation facilitates conceptual access. Experiment 2 showed no significant posture effects on SF measures for either category. These findings support a weak embodiment perspective where motor systems influence semantic retrieval processes rather than core representations themselves. The context-dependent nature of the effects highlights that embodied influences on semantic memory are more flexible and task-sensitive than previously assumed. Motor involvement in semantic processing appears to depend critically on the specific relationship between concurrent motor activity and the conceptual domain being accessed, challenging assumptions about robust, context-independent embodied effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.