ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Revisiting central positional vertigo and nystagmus through the velocity-storage mechanism.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positional vertigo and nystagmus may occur when inputs from the semicircular canals and otolithic organs are mismatched, and when this mismatch originates from central dysfunction it is called central positional vertigo and nystagmus (CPVN). Therefore, the velocity-storage (VS) circuit, which computes composite estimates of rotational velocity, gravity orientation, and inertial acceleration from peripheral vestibular signals, underlies the generation of CPVN. In this review, we begin by detailing the VS circuit via a deterministic model that demonstrates how it estimates rotational velocity, gravity orientation, and inertial acceleration. Given the hierarchical and reciprocal information processing within the VS circuit, an error at any stage can propagate and cause subsequent errors. For example, a false rotational estimate can cascade into other estimates, such as gravity orientation and inertial acceleration. Hence, the VS model provides a unified framework for explaining CPVN resulting from central lesions. We then synthesize clinical observations of CPVN to date, classifying them into two temporal forms-paroxysmal and persistent-and provide mechanistic explanations: paroxysmal CPVN is driven by exaggerated post-rotatory rebound, whereas persistent CPVN results from a head-fixed gravity bias. These mechanisms are corroborated by deterministic VS model simulations, in which mechanism-based lesions within the VS circuit faithfully reproduce the paroxysmal and persistent CPVN features observed in patients. Furthermore, by extending the VS model, we show how an adaptive loop in the VS integrator accounts for the positional modulation of periodic alternating nystagmus, and how a conditional (orientation-dependent) error in gravity estimation explains the recently described periodic downbeat nystagmus in the supine position. By capturing the broad clinical spectrum of CPVN and reproducing it with the VS circuit model, we provide key insights for accurately diagnosing central dysfunction in positional vertigo and nystagmus and present a comprehensive pathophysiological framework for CPVN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.