Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Phase II study of 1st-line durvalumab and platinum-etoposide in advanced large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (aLCNEC).
Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLCNEC is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy with poor prognosis and limited evidence to guide systemic therapy.
methodsProspective, single-arm phase II study of 1st-line durvalumab 1500 mg + cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide (EP) q3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4 weeks, in aLCNEC. The primary endpoint was 12-month PFS (RECIST v1.1, radiologist-assessed); secondary endpoints were ORR, OS, and safety. Sample size followed a single-stage Fleming design (one-sided α = 0.10, power 80%) testing a 12-month PFS rate ≤ 5% (H0) vs ≥ 18% (H1). The study closed early due to slow accrual after twelve of twenty-two planned patients were enrolled.
resultsTwelve patients were treated (median age 68y; 66.7% male; 91.7% smokers; 91.7% stage IVB). After median follow-up of 12.8 months (95% CI 8.5-21.3), 92% had progressed and 75% had died. Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.1-12.9); 12-month PFS was 25.0% (95% CI 6.0-50.5), exceeding the ≤ 5% null hypothesis (H0) and compatible with the ≥ 18% target (H1). Median OS was 12.8 months (95% CI 5.2-NR); 12-month OS was 58.3% (95% CI 27.0-80.1). ORR was 50.0%, and DCR was 91.7%. All three patients with untreated brain metastases achieved complete intracranial response. Toxicities were mainly grade 1-2; 41.7% had grade 3 adverse events; three discontinued durvalumab for immune-related toxicity; and no treatment-related deaths occurred.
conclusionsThis first prospective evaluation of durvalumab + EP in aLCNEC, though underpowered, demonstrates efficacy and safety consistent with design expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.