Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334587›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

Can the use of a visual obturator-assisted resectoscope reduce the incidence of urethral strictures after TURP?: a multicenter propensity-matched study.

Muhammed Selcuk Ozer, Volkan Sen, Alper Ege Sarikaya, Mehmed Emin Kayacan, Murat Gulsen, Murat Isitan, Nebil Akdogan, Laith Abedalqader Abdul Hadi Albanna, Cemil Aydin, Alpkon Torun and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammed Selcuk OzerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. mseljukozer@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2691
Volkan SenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Alper Ege SarikayaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Mehmed Emin KayacanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Murat GulsenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Murat IsitanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Nebil AkdoganFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Laith Abedalqader Abdul Hadi AlbannaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Cemil AydinFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Alpkon TorunFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Mehmet Emin ArayıcıFaculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozan BozkurtFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrethral stricture (US) is a significant long-term complication of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), often linked to mechanical trauma during instrument insertion. This study evaluated whether advancing the resectoscope sheath under direct vision using a visual obturator reduces postoperative US incidence compared to blind insertion. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective multicenter study was conducted across four centers involving patients who underwent bipolar TURP between 2020 and 2025. After applying propensity score matching to minimize baseline bias, 962 patients were analyzed (481 per group: visual vs. blind obturator). Primary outcomes included US incidence, perioperative variables, and functional results (Qmax). Subgroup analysis was performed based on prostate volume.

resultsThe overall US incidence was 12.4%. Patients in the visual obturator group had a significantly lower US rate compared to the blind group (7.7% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). Visual guidance also correlated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications and acute urinary retention. Subgroup analysis revealed that the protective effect of the visual obturator was most pronounced in prostates > 60 cc. While traditional predictors like operative time and prostate volume showed modest discriminatory ability for US risk in the blind group, their impact was mitigated in the visual group. Both groups showed improved Qmax, with a higher baseline and more stable trend in the visual cohort.

conclusionDirect vision advancement of the resectoscope sheath using a visual obturator significantly reduces the risk of urethral stricture and postoperative morbidity. This technique offers a simple, effective strategy to minimize urethral trauma, particularly in larger prostates, and should be considered for routine use.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateUrethral StrictureAgedHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesBenign prostatic hyperplasiaPostoperative complicationsSurgical instrumentsTransurethral resection of prostateUrethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID42334587
PMCPMC13291055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.