ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Can the use of a visual obturator-assisted resectoscope reduce the incidence of urethral strictures after TURP?: a multicenter propensity-matched study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can propensity-score matching distinguish the effect of visual obturator use from center-level practice differences during TURP?World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUrethral stricture (US) is a significant long-term complication of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), often linked to mechanical trauma during instrument insertion. This study evaluated whether advancing the resectoscope sheath under direct vision using a visual obturator reduces postoperative US incidence compared to blind insertion. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective multicenter study was conducted across four centers involving patients who underwent bipolar TURP between 2020 and 2025. After applying propensity score matching to minimize baseline bias, 962 patients were analyzed (481 per group: visual vs. blind obturator). Primary outcomes included US incidence, perioperative variables, and functional results (Qmax). Subgroup analysis was performed based on prostate volume.
resultsThe overall US incidence was 12.4%. Patients in the visual obturator group had a significantly lower US rate compared to the blind group (7.7% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). Visual guidance also correlated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications and acute urinary retention. Subgroup analysis revealed that the protective effect of the visual obturator was most pronounced in prostates > 60 cc. While traditional predictors like operative time and prostate volume showed modest discriminatory ability for US risk in the blind group, their impact was mitigated in the visual group. Both groups showed improved Qmax, with a higher baseline and more stable trend in the visual cohort.
conclusionDirect vision advancement of the resectoscope sheath using a visual obturator significantly reduces the risk of urethral stricture and postoperative morbidity. This technique offers a simple, effective strategy to minimize urethral trauma, particularly in larger prostates, and should be considered for routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.