ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Keeping track of things: large language models for patient synopses : Source-bound system for clinical information systems].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing documentation burden in electronic health records makes it difficult to obtain a rapid overview of relevant prior information in complex disease courses. Especially in highly digitized settings such as radiology and interdisciplinary case conferences, large volumes of heterogeneous documents must be reviewed under time pressure.
objectiveThe aim was to develop a large language model (LLM)-based patient synopsis to accelerate information retrieval while ensuring transparency, physician oversight, and data protection. MATERIALS AND
methodsAt the University Medical Center Freiburg, a system was developed for the automated integration of clinical documents from multiple primary systems, including the electronic health record (EHR), picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and other subsystems. It uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), metadata harmonization, vector search, and agentic retrieval for the context-sensitive selection of relevant content. The system operates with role-based access control, end-to-end source attribution, and processing in a sovereign cloud without persistent data storage.
resultsThe system enables patient-specific queries, structured longitudinal summaries, and automated, source-grounded summaries to support preparation for interdisciplinary case discussions. All statements remain traceable to primary documents, while medical interpretation and decision-making remain the responsibility of the treating physician. Interoperable information systems and a data protection framework in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the German Social Code Book V (SGB V), and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act are prerequisites for implementation.
conclusionLLM-based patient synopses can support text-intensive clinical workflows, provided that controlled retrieval, clear source attribution, physician validation, and an interoperable, regulation-compliant system architecture are in place. Prospective evaluations are required before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.