Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334582›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Keeping track of things: large language models for patient synopses : Source-bound system for clinical information systems].

Philipp Arnold, Johannes Jahn, Fabian Bamberg, Elmar Kotter

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philipp ArnoldKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. philipp.arnold@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Johannes JahnKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Fabian BambergKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Elmar KotterKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing documentation burden in electronic health records makes it difficult to obtain a rapid overview of relevant prior information in complex disease courses. Especially in highly digitized settings such as radiology and interdisciplinary case conferences, large volumes of heterogeneous documents must be reviewed under time pressure.

objectiveThe aim was to develop a large language model (LLM)-based patient synopsis to accelerate information retrieval while ensuring transparency, physician oversight, and data protection. MATERIALS AND

methodsAt the University Medical Center Freiburg, a system was developed for the automated integration of clinical documents from multiple primary systems, including the electronic health record (EHR), picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and other subsystems. It uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), metadata harmonization, vector search, and agentic retrieval for the context-sensitive selection of relevant content. The system operates with role-based access control, end-to-end source attribution, and processing in a sovereign cloud without persistent data storage.

resultsThe system enables patient-specific queries, structured longitudinal summaries, and automated, source-grounded summaries to support preparation for interdisciplinary case discussions. All statements remain traceable to primary documents, while medical interpretation and decision-making remain the responsibility of the treating physician. Interoperable information systems and a data protection framework in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the German Social Code Book V (SGB V), and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act are prerequisites for implementation.

conclusionLLM-based patient synopses can support text-intensive clinical workflows, provided that controlled retrieval, clear source attribution, physician validation, and an interoperable, regulation-compliant system architecture are in place. Prospective evaluations are required before routine clinical use.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInformation Storage and RetrievalLarge Language ModelsRadiology Information SystemsGermanyHumansArtificial intelligenceData protectionIndexing pipelineRetrieval-Augmented GenerationSource attribution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.