ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
The guiding significance of calcaneal tuberosity integrity in the surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal surgical approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains contentious. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) reduces soft-tissue complications, its application in complex fractures is debated. Ligamentotaxis, a cornerstone of MIS, requires an intact calcaneal tuberosity as a fulcrum. This study evaluates the utility of preoperative tuberosity integrity assessment in guiding surgical approach selection.
methodsIn this retrospective case-control study, 118 patients (2019-2022) were allocated to two treatment algorithms due to an institutional protocol evolution. Group A (Sanders-guided, n = 51) received MIS for Sanders type II/III and ELA for type IV. Group B (tuberosity-guided, n = 67) received MIS if the tuberosity was intact or an extended lateral approach (ELA) if comminuted. Outcomes included operative metrics, radiographic reduction (Böhler's angle, facet step-off), functional scores (AOFAS, Maryland Foot Score), VAS pain scores, and complications.
resultsNo significant differences were observed in radiographic or functional outcomes between the two groups. However, the tuberosity-guided approach suggested a potential reduction in operative time for fractures with comminuted tuberosity (93.5 ± 6.1 min vs. 103.2 ± 4.7 min, p = 0.017, a preliminary finding due to the small sample size). Analysis of the entire cohort (n = 118) revealed that the wound complication rate was notably higher when comminuted tuberosity fractures were treated with STA (2/2, 100%) compared to ELA (1/9, 11.1%, p = 0.011). Furthermore, among all STA cases, patients with comminuted tuberosity had a markedly higher observed complication rate than those with intact tuberosity (100% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001).
conclusionPreoperative assessment of calcaneal tuberosity integrity offers a potentially valuable adjunct to the Sanders classification for selecting the surgical approach in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. It achieves comparable clinical outcomes. Given the exploratory nature of subgroup analyses based on a limited number of comminuted fractures, the findings regarding enhanced operative efficiency and complication profiles are preliminary and require validation in larger, prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.