ArticleProtoplasma2026
HPLC for the detection of cholesterol levels, and its relationship with soybean fraud in meat products, and an economic view.
Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inflammation - a blessing and a curse.Protoplasma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The currently known favorable properties of soybean have become the target of fraud in meat production. The use of plant-based raw materials in the adulteration of meat products is increasingly recognized by consumers, manufacturers, and researchers. However, the toxicity of soybeans has not been addressed. This article aimed to focus on the following: detection, quantification of soybean adulteration in meat products, analyzing how other adulterants could impact cholesterol levels in the products, and discussing how soybean adulteration could cause conditions such as allergies and toxicity. Utilizing immunohistochemical techniques, 450 different meat product samples were analyzed. Highlighting the confirmed soybean adulteration by analyzing cholesterol levels using HPLC. Results showed that, across all tested cases, soybean toxic doses ranged from 62% to 85%. Meanwhile, there were no indications on their respective nutritional facts labels. Surprisingly, the cholesterol levels were lower than those reported by previous investigators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.