ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
Regenerative therapies in rehabilitation with interfaces with occupational medicine, geriatrics, and oncology: the example of extracorporeal shock wave therapy.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegenerative therapies are increasingly integrated into modern rehabilitation medicine. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) represents a central modality within this framework, extending beyond symptom control toward enabling functional recovery across disciplines including occupational medicine, geriatrics, and oncology. In addition, its potential socioeconomic impact is of growing relevance.
methodsThis work comprises a narrative synthesis integrating concepts of regenerative medicine, rehabilitation, prehabilitation, prevention, and health economics, with a focus on ESWT as a mechanotherapeutic intervention.
resultsRehabilitation is based on a biopsychosocial model targeting body functions, activities, and participation. By reducing pain, modulating inflammation, and promoting tissue regeneration, ESWT acts as a biological "enabler" thereby, facilitating active rehabilitation strategies. In oncological settings, ESWT may support the management of treatment-related functional impairments. In occupational medicine and geriatrics, it contributes to maintaining ability to work and independence. From a socioeconomic perspective, ESWT may reduce healthcare utilization, prevent chronicity, shorten the duration of rehabilitation, and facilitate return to work, thereby lowering indirect costs. While evidence for primary prevention is lacking, ESWT is relevant in tertiary and quaternary prevention.
conclusionExtracorporeal shock wave therapy represents a key component of regenerative rehabilitation strategies. Its function-oriented and potentially cost-effective application enhances mobility, participation, and quality of life, particularly in ageing and multimorbid populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.