ReviewJournal of community genetics2026
Underutilisation of hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease: a global scoping review of multilevel barriers and facilitators.
Review in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydroxyurea (HU) is an effective therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD) but remains underused worldwide. This scoping review aimed to identify geographical and multilevel barriers and facilitators influencing hydroxyurea initiation, uptake, and sustained use, using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) as a framework to guide the analysis and interpretation of findings. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used as an analytical framework to categorise and synthesise barriers and facilitators identified in the literature. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs reporting barriers and/or facilitators to hydroxyurea use among individuals with SCD. We identified 30 studies across Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Barriers to hydroxyurea use were reported across individual, caregiver, provider, health-system, and policy levels. Common barriers included negative beliefs, fear of adverse effects, limited knowledge, financial constraints, and gaps in access and monitoring. Facilitators included education, shared decision-making, peer support, provider training, guideline availability, insurance coverage, and improved drug access. Across settings, structural and health-system barriers were more consistently reported than individual-level factors, suggesting that hydroxyurea underutilisation is driven largely by system-level constraints rather than patient behaviour alone. Underutilisation of hydroxyurea in SCD reflects interacting socio-ecological barriers rather than patient non-adherence alone. Addressing these challenges will require coordinated, multilevel strategies that prioritise health-system strengthening alongside patient support to ensure sustained and equitable access to hydroxyurea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.