Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334489›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

Understanding complex analytical data by a supervised correlation coefficient obtained from random forest.

Stephan Seifert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephan SeifertHamburg School of Food Science, Department of Chemistry, Universität Hamburg, Grindelallee 117, 20146, Hamburg, Germany. stephan.seifert@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-5728

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 511107129Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 561375600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of complex analytical data, such as that obtained from mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, or vibrational spectroscopic approaches, necessitates the employment of multivariate chemometric methods for the classification of biological samples or the quantification of individual components. In this context, accurate prediction of the samples is not the sole aim. The interpretation of the variables that contribute to this prediction is also of utmost importance. Consequently, a range of algorithms, e.g., based on partial least squares regression or random forest, have been developed for variable selection. One of these approaches, Surrogate Minimal Depth (SMD), utilizes surrogate variables, which are obtained in random forest, to incorporate variable relationships into the analysis of variable importance and to examine the mutual impact of variables on the model. The latter is expressed as a parameter that can be regarded as a supervised correlation coefficient. This paper aims to lucidly illustrate the selection of variables and the analysis of variable relationships with SMD. Furthermore, the method's potential for analyzing complex analytical data will be highlighted by demonstrating its application to various types of analytical data.

Indexed as

BeveragesChemometricsFoodsICP-MSIR spectroscopyMass spectrometryRaman spectroscopySoftwareStatisticsVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID42334489
PMCPMC13585831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.