ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular bacteria in the early stages of host adaptation often show extraordinarily disrupted genomes, where up to half of their ancestral genes are found in a pseudogenized state. The mealybug Pseudococcus longispinus hosts two bacterial endosymbionts with high pseudogene loads, Symbiopectobacterium endolongispinus and Sodalis endolongispinus. Here, we measure transcript abundance, ribosome-associated RNA, and protein abundance in these bacterial symbionts to understand how bacteria avoid (or fail to avoid) accumulating large amounts of non-functional RNAs and proteins from these pseudogenes. Consistent with previous work, we show that pseudogene transcripts remain detectable, but at lower levels compared to those from intact and functional genes, and that relatively few pseudogenes yield detectable proteins in proteomic data. However, we find that many pseudogene transcripts still bind to Symbiopectobacterium ribosomes, and uncover a possible role for the tmRNA ribosome rescue system in the targeting of pseudogene proteins for degradation. Our results suggest a possible mechanism by which bacterial endosymbionts remove aberrant pseudogene-derived proteins during the critical time when many pseudogenes have formed but not enough time has passed for sequence evolution to erode ribosome binding sites from pseudogene transcripts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.