ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Accuracy of Key Sonographic Markers for Juxta-Articular Fractures: A Prospective Study Using Explainable Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically evaluate sonographic features of long bone juxta-articular fractures and identify key diagnostic predictors using machine learning-based feature selection.
methodsThis prospective single-center diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 121 patients with clinically suspected juxta-articular fractures. Ten predefined sonographic features were assessed, with computed tomography (CT) serving as the reference standard. Key features were identified using shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and the 3 top-ranked features were used to construct a decision tree-based sonographic triad model, hereafter referred to as the sonographic triad model. This model generated a final binary ultrasound diagnosis for each suspected fracture site. Agreement between the final binary ultrasound diagnosis and CT was quantified using Cohen's κ with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was evaluated using blinded dual-reader review across the cohort. Diagnostic performance was quantified by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsAnalysis of 209 suspected juxta-articular fracture sites revealed that subcutaneous soft-tissue edema (88.5%), cortical separation (50.7%), and heterogeneous intra-articular effusion (56.9%) were the most prevalent findings. The SHAP analysis identified a specific predictive triad. The 3 primary predictors were subperiosteal hematoma (43.8% contribution), arc-shaped fracture end (28.3%), and heterogeneous intra-articular effusion (26.6%). These 3 features collectively accounted for 98.7% of the total feature importance and demonstrated high reproducibility, with good inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.833-0.980) and excellent intra-observer agreement (κ = 0.987-1.000). The final binary ultrasound diagnosis generated by the sonographic triad model demonstrated near-perfect agreement with CT at the suspected fracture-site level (κ = 0.904, 95% CI: 0.847-0.962). In addition, the sonographic triad model achieved excellent diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 93.0%, specificity of 97.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.8%, and an AUC of 0.966.
conclusionsThe sonographic triad model, based on subperiosteal hematoma, arc-shaped fracture end, and heterogeneous intra-articular effusion, demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and strong concordance with CT for suspected juxta-articular long-bone fractures. This radiation-free and rapid approach may assist early screening and triage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.