ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Individual Identification of Prey in Carnivore Scats.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive genetic sampling is widely used in ecology and conservation to identify predators and their diets but recovering individual-level information from consumed prey remains largely unexplored. We evaluated whether individual prey can be reliably genotyped from carnivore scats and assessed limitations associated with degraded and mixed DNA sources. We developed a 31-locus SNP panel optimized for genotyping degraded elk (Cervus canadensis) DNA using amplicon sequencing. We validated prey genotyping by matching elk genotypes recovered from carnivore scats ('carcass scats') collected at cougar (Puma concolor) kill sites to genotypes from corresponding elk carcasses. We also genotyped scats collected throughout the study area, identified as containing elk using DNA metabarcoding ('survey scats'). To avoid misidentifying multiple individuals in a scat as a unique genotype, we evaluated artificial mixtures of prey DNA to assess the ability to detect and filter samples containing mixed DNA. Elk genotypes recovered from carcass scats matched associated carcass genotypes, confirming accurate recovery of individual prey DNA from carnivore scats. Genotyping success was 88% in fresh carcass scats and 74% in survey scats of unknown age. Heterozygosity excess filtering removed most mixed samples, although one of 24 mixtures with equal DNA contributions from two individuals produced a false unique genotype. Our results demonstrate that carnivore scats can serve as a reliable source of individual-level prey DNA under appropriate conditions. This method provides a new data stream on individual prey mortality, predation rates, and scavenging dynamics, processes that have previously been difficult to quantify without invasive capture and collaring techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.