Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334139›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

Individual Identification of Prey in Carnivore Scats.

Charlotte E Eriksson, Marcus Bianco, Joel Ruprecht, Darren A Clark, Taal Levi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte E ErikssonDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-2318
Marcus BiancoDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5300-5855
Joel RuprechtDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Darren A ClarkOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, La Grande, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-9826
Taal LeviDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2317537Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive genetic sampling is widely used in ecology and conservation to identify predators and their diets but recovering individual-level information from consumed prey remains largely unexplored. We evaluated whether individual prey can be reliably genotyped from carnivore scats and assessed limitations associated with degraded and mixed DNA sources. We developed a 31-locus SNP panel optimized for genotyping degraded elk (Cervus canadensis) DNA using amplicon sequencing. We validated prey genotyping by matching elk genotypes recovered from carnivore scats ('carcass scats') collected at cougar (Puma concolor) kill sites to genotypes from corresponding elk carcasses. We also genotyped scats collected throughout the study area, identified as containing elk using DNA metabarcoding ('survey scats'). To avoid misidentifying multiple individuals in a scat as a unique genotype, we evaluated artificial mixtures of prey DNA to assess the ability to detect and filter samples containing mixed DNA. Elk genotypes recovered from carcass scats matched associated carcass genotypes, confirming accurate recovery of individual prey DNA from carnivore scats. Genotyping success was 88% in fresh carcass scats and 74% in survey scats of unknown age. Heterozygosity excess filtering removed most mixed samples, although one of 24 mixtures with equal DNA contributions from two individuals produced a false unique genotype. Our results demonstrate that carnivore scats can serve as a reliable source of individual-level prey DNA under appropriate conditions. This method provides a new data stream on individual prey mortality, predation rates, and scavenging dynamics, processes that have previously been difficult to quantify without invasive capture and collaring techniques.

Indexed as

DeerFecesGenotyping TechniquesAnimalsGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePumaSequence Analysis, DNAamplicon sequencingenvironmental DNAfecal DNAnoninvasive genetic samplingscatssingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID42334139
PMCPMC13288790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.