ArticleJournal of phycology2026
The evolutionary ecology of reproduction in the red alga Palmaria palmata: Insights from an atypical life cycle.
Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolutionary ecology of reproduction in the red alga Palmaria palmata: Insights from an atypical life cycle.Journal of phycology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike other red algae, the perennial species Palmaria palmata exhibits pronounced sexual dimorphism with a microscopic female gametophytic phase that does not produce cystocarps. To investigate how these unique features of its life cycle influence its reproductive mode, we analyzed the relative proportion of macroscopic individuals (tetrasporophytes vs. male gametophytes) across multiple geographic scales and between intertidal and subtidal habitats along the western coast of France (892 individuals collected from 17 locations). Because female gametophytes are microscopic and cannot be directly sampled in the field, their frequencies were inferred under two alternative hypotheses: (H1) assuming an equal sex ratio (i.e., the proportion of females equal to males) and (H2) assuming the proportion of females equals tetrasporophytes, given that tetrasporophytes develop directly on a female gametophyte. Under H1, our results predict a demographic advantage of tetrasporophytes over gametophytes. Moreover, tetrasporophytes were significantly more abundant in intertidal than in subtidal zones, likely reflecting their greater resilience to environmental fluctuations. Conversely, under H2, the sex ratio was significantly biased toward female gametophytes and the estimated proportion of tetrasporophytes was lower than that of gametophytes. In addition, the relative contribution of self-fertilization and clonal reproduction were assessed using 11 microsatellite markers. These findings confirm that this species reproduces mainly sexually and suggest that sexual dimorphism may limit selfing and enhance the survival of the tetrasporophyte, which develops directly on the female, thereby compensating for the absence of cystocarps. Overall, our results provide valuable insights into the reproductive strategies and adaptive potential of this commercially important alga.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.