Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333916›Full record

ArticleHeadache2026

College students' migraine perceptions and lived experiences: A qualitative study.

Mia T Minen, Julia Dorf, Sara Novo, David Gima, Shreya Nasker, Mara Getz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mia T MinenDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-3703
Julia DorfDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8401-8365
Sara NovoDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8239-9944
David GimaDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6884-4044
Shreya NaskerDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2837-6213
Mara GetzFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York, USA.

Funding

Building Research Aspirations In NeurologyR25NS125593 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Mia Minen · 2023 to 2026
$540k
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS125593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objectives were to understand migraine-related perceptions among college students and the lived experiences of those with migraine on college campuses and to generate recommendations for supporting college students with migraine.

backgroundDuring young adulthood, there is a sharp growth in migraine prevalence and disability-adjusted life years. Migraine prevalence is approximately 16% among university students and negatively influences several aspects of a student's college experience.

methodsThis was a qualitative study using phenomenological inquiry via virtual semistructured focus groups. Recruitment took place between April 2025 and July 2025. An initial 60-min focus group was conducted in May 2025 with an all-women's college to assess our questions' relevance and comprehensiveness. We then conducted four national focus groups in June 2025 and July 2025 with college students from across the United States. All focus groups included students with and without severe headache or migraine (self-reported). Focus groups were transcribed and independently coded twice. We developed themes for the five focus groups using content analysis. Qualitative analysis was conducted between July 2025 and September 2025.

resultsThree students attended the all-women's college focus group and 47 students attended one of the four national focus groups (n = 50). The following themes emerged from the five focus groups: (1) Migraine is often misunderstood and not discussed on campus, with misconceptions surrounding severity and its distinction from headache. (2) The impact of migraine on campus is significant, with students reporting various triggering environments, difficulty maintaining focus, attending class, performing academically, preserving social relationships, and participating in extracurricular activities. (3) The most commonly reported accommodations for migraine were academic, specifically exam- and attendance-related, though not always honored by professors. (4) Access to migraine care for students is challenging, with reports that student health centers are typically unapproachable, inconvenient, and unhelpful, with students seeking external providers for migraine. Students recommended more awareness and education initiatives for improved understanding of migraine as well as increased access to migraine resources and accommodations.

conclusionThe experiences captured in our study provide unique qualitative insights by highlighting how misunderstanding of migraine on campus contributes to social and academic challenges faced by students with migraine. Students described unmet needs related to widespread misunderstanding of migraine, limited academic flexibility, environmental triggers, limited access to care, and inconsistent implementation of accommodations, highlighting that greater awareness of migraine, especially by professors and student health services, is crucial on college campuses. There are opportunities for migraine education programs on college campuses to increase knowledge and awareness about migraine and create a more supportive migraine environment.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMigraine DisordersStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUniversitiesYoung Adultcollegefocus groupsmigrainestudents

Identifiers

PMID42333916
PMCPMC13571040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.