ArticleNucleic acids research2026
SNIPSNP: precision design of CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in reagents for variant correction and disease modeling.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present SNIPSNP (crisprtools.org/snipsnp), a comprehensive bioinformatics pipeline for designing experiments for CRISPR-induced homology-directed repair (HDR). The tool addresses the critical challenge of Cas9 re-cleavage by simplifying the selection of "blocking" silent variants that are effective at inhibiting RNP binding upon donor-templated editing. SNIPSNP handles complex edits, including indels, and uses multi-objective optimization to balance editing efficiency with biological safety. From user-defined wild-type and desired HDR alleles, the pipeline identifies candidate guides, annotating them with integrated efficiency scores and genome-wide off-target assessments. Uniquely, SNIPSNP evaluates guide binding against the post-edit genome to determine whether the therapeutic variant alone disrupts repeated Cas9 recognition. When necessary, it introduces synonymous blocking variants, prioritizing PAM and seed regions to minimize re-cleavage probability and editing of the wild-type (WT) allele when editing heterozygous variants. All candidate modifications undergo safety profiling and prioritization of known benign variants from dbSNP. We experimentally validated SNIPSNP and benchmarked it on pathogenic inborn error of immunity variants in primary patient T-cells. Across loci, SNIPSNP-designed templates outperform standard "correction-only" strategies, demonstrating enhanced precision editing, and reduced re-cleavage, establishing SNIPSNP as a robust platform for genome editing and disease modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.