SynthesisChronic respiratory disease
Use of oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices to augment sputum clearance in COPD: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionEffective airway clearance is crucial in COPD management, and oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices are a potential adjunct therapy for this. However, their clinical efficacy remains uncertain due to limited trial data.AimTo update our previous (2020) systematic review investigating the use of OPEP devices to augment sputum clearance in COPD.MethodsRandomised Clinical Trails s evaluating OPEP devices in COPD were identified from PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase (2020-2024). Outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with pooled estimates calculated using random-effects models.ResultsTwelve trials (741 participants) were included. OPEP devices significantly reduced exacerbations (Odds Ratio: 0.39) and improved exercise capacity (+49 m at 6MWD). Small improvements were observed in FVC%, while HRQoL changes were not statistically significant. Accumulating evidence suggests benefits for sputum clearance and reduced antibiotic use. Devices were generally well accepted and safe.ConclusionOPEP devices appear to be safe and may reduce exacerbations, improve functional exercise capacity, and support sputum clearance in COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.