ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026
Clinical scope and workforce contribution of advanced nurse practitioners in general practice: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: The clinical activity of nurses in general practice.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To examine the clinical activity and workforce contribution of Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) working in general practice. Background: Primary care systems internationally are experiencing increasing demand due to ageing populations, rising multimorbidity and workforce shortages. Advanced nursing practice has expanded globally as a strategy to strengthen service capacity, improve access and maintain quality outcomes. Although there is substantial evidence regarding patient outcomes associated with advanced practice roles, there is comparatively limited empirical data describing the day-to-day clinical activity of ANPs in primary care settings. Methods: This national cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted in Ireland and reported in accordance with the STROBE Statement, involved a 1-week activity capture of General Practice Advanced Nurse Practitioners (GP ANPs) and candidate ANPs (cANPs) working across general practice settings. Data collected included consultation type, prescribing activity, complexity of care and clinical outcomes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty GP ANPs/candidate ANPs recorded 1659 consultations, including 757 full episodes of care (45.6%). Practice spanned acute illness (adults and children), chronic disease management, women's health and preventive services. Medication optimisation activity included 503 medication reviews, 251 prescriptions issued and 59 medications deprescribed. About 15% of consultations were classified as complex and 14.8% involved multiple presenting complaints. Most consultations were independently managed. Conclusion: GP ANPs demonstrate broad clinical capability and contribute substantially to general practice capacity. The findings highlight the value of a holistic nursing approach, which is well suited to chronic disease management, health promotion, patient education and the management of multimorbidity, supporting access to care and strengthening primary care workforce capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.