Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333373›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Smallest Detectable Change of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain in a High-Presenteeism Population: Female Teleworkers with Chronic Neck/Shoulder Stiffness.

Hiroshi Takasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroshi TakasakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pain Science Education (PSE) aims to improve patients' understanding of pain based on modern pain science, empowering informed care choices and supporting better health outcomes and has demonstrated effectiveness in chronic musculoskeletal conditions. The Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain (KNAP) questionnaire was developed to assess the knowledge and attitudes about pain science in physical therapy students undergoing PSE. In 2022, a Japanese-language version was created that is comprehensible to university students without specialized knowledge of pain. The KNAP is expected to assess changes in patients' knowledge of pain science and attitudes toward pain among those receiving PSE, but its measurement error in patient populations remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the smallest detectable change (SDC) of the Japanese KNAP among female teleworkers with chronic neck/shoulder stiffness, a population with high levels of presenteeism. Methodology This test-retest reliability study was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving female teleworkers with presenteeism related to neck/shoulder stiffness. Participants who completed the final one-year follow-up and who still had neck/shoulder stiffness were invited. The KNAP was administered via a web-based survey twice, with a one-week interval. The SDC was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results A total of 101 participants completed two surveys. The mean KNAP total score was 75.6 (standard deviation (SD) 3.7). The SDC was 6.5.  Conclusion The KNAP demonstrated a smallest detectable change of 6.5 points in female teleworkers with chronic neck/shoulder stiffness, indicating the threshold for changes beyond measurement error at the individual level. This finding contributes to the interpretability of the KNAP and may assist in evaluating changes over time, although the clinical importance of such changes remains to be established.

Indexed as

interpretabilitymeasurement erroroutcome measurementpain neuroscience education (pne)test-retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID42333373
PMCPMC13283524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.