ArticleCureus2026
Effect of Sling Suspension-Based Active Shoulder Joint Exercises on Shoulder Subluxation in Subacute Stroke Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Shoulder subluxation has an incidence of up to 80% following stroke. It commonly occurs during the flaccid stage due to reduced muscle tone in the rotator cuff muscles, allowing gravitational pull on the humerus and resulting in widening of the acromion-humeral gap. Sling suspension enables partially unloaded active movement of the shoulder joint; however, evidence regarding its effectiveness in subacute stroke patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sling suspension-based active shoulder exercises on shoulder subluxation in subacute stroke patients. Methods A randomized controlled trial with a pretest-posttest design was conducted on 28 subacute stroke patients who were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups (n = 14 each). Both groups received a standard rehabilitation program consisting of weight-bearing and scapular stabilization exercises for the affected upper limb. In addition, the experimental group performed sling suspension-based active shoulder exercises, in which the limb was supported in a suspension system to facilitate gravity-minimized active movements. The control group performed conventional active-assisted range of motion (AAROM) exercises with therapist assistance, without sling support. All participants received 30 minutes of intervention per session, five days per week for four weeks. Shoulder subluxation was assessed using the measuring tape method (acromion-humeral distance) by a blinded outcome assessor. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 31.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Within-group comparisons were performed using the paired t-test, and between-group comparisons of mean difference were analyzed using the independent samples t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in shoulder subluxation following the intervention; however, the experimental group showed significantly greater improvement than the control group. The experimental group demonstrated a mean reduction of 6.3 ± 1.2 mm, whereas the control group demonstrated a mean reduction of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm. Between-group analysis revealed a statistically significant difference favoring the experimental group (mean difference: 4.0 mm; p < 0.001). Conclusion The findings indicate that sling suspension-based active shoulder exercises, when combined with standard rehabilitation, produce greater reductions in shoulder subluxation than conventional AAROM exercises in individuals with subacute stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.