Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333365›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Hospital Quality Management, Patient Safety, and Accreditation Readiness: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Nitin Marathe, Manish Ranjan, Madhusudan P Singh, Pragati Trigunait, Avinash Prakash, Nitin Kaushal, Amit Pawar, Girish Singh Kshatriya, Rounak Dubey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nitin MaratheHospital Administration, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Manish RanjanMicrobiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Madhusudan P SinghPharmacology and Therapeutics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Pragati TrigunaitObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Avinash PrakashAnaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Nitin KaushalCommunity Medicine and Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Amit PawarTransfusion Medicine, Military Hospital Doda, Jammu, IND.
Girish Singh KshatriyaTransfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Rounak DubeyTransfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As healthcare systems become increasingly data-driven, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are being explored as tools to support quality management, patient safety, and accreditation. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence across these domains through a structured literature search of major biomedical databases, encompassing studies published over the past decade and narratively synthesized to capture implementation context alongside technical performance. Three electronic databases were searched, and 23 studies were included. The available empirical evidence suggests that these technologies are most useful for repetitive, operationally well-defined, and digitally captured tasks, while local validation, acceptance testing, and continuous monitoring consistently emerge as prerequisites for safe institutional deployment. Governance capacity and organizational readiness are identified as equally determinative of outcomes as algorithmic performance itself. Collectively, the evidence supports positioning AI and ML as augmentative instruments within human-led quality governance structures, rather than as autonomous operational systems. Evidence was heterogeneous, with most empirical studies being single-center, retrospective, or implementation-focused. The risk-of-bias assessment indicated limited high-quality comparative evidence, limiting the strength of the pooled conclusions.

Indexed as

accreditationartificial intelligencedeep learninghealthcare governancehospital quality managementmachine learningnatural language processingpatient safetyquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID42333365
PMCPMC13283513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.