ArticleCureus2026
Positional Hemodynamic Instability in a Patient With Pectus Excavatum Undergoing Lumbar Discectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity, accounting for 90% of cases, and may predispose patients to hemodynamic compromise due to cardiac compression. Such events during spinal surgery, however, are rarely reported. In the widely used genupectoral prone position for spine surgeries, the patient lies prone with the torso supported and the legs flexed, thereby reducing abdominal compression, improving venous drainage, and reducing bleeding. However, the support provided by the thorax in this position may cause significant mediastinal compression in the presence of pectus excavatum, potentially resulting in hemodynamic instability. In this case, a 65-year-old man experienced hemodynamic collapse more than ten minutes after positioning, following further optimization of thoracic support for lumbar discectomy. The procedure was halted, and the patient was repositioned supine, which promptly resolved the instability. Postoperative evaluation revealed a Type 2 myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) without significant coronary artery stenosis on delayed angiography, consistent with demand ischemia secondary to mechanically induced reduction in cardiac output. Given the risk of spinal epidural hematoma, the decision to delay anticoagulation is the most instructive point for spine surgeons and should remain central to this discussion. Although the clinical course was ultimately benign, neurosurgeons and anesthesiologists should remain aware of the potential complications associated with the knee-chest position in patients with significant pectus excavatum. A thorough physical examination is therefore essential before positioning a patient, even for standard procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.