ArticleCureus2026
How Patient-Specific Guides Can Ease the Learning Curve of Cortical Bone Trajectory: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of the study was to compare operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), and perioperative complications between lumbar fusions performed with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) versus freehand. Secondary objectives were to quantify the learning curve and economic impact of PSI. Methodology: We reviewed all CBT lumbar fusions performed by a single surgeon between 2018 and 2025, comparing a freehand approach with CT-guided PSI assistance. Thin-cut CT scans were used to build individualized, 3D-printed guides. Propensity matching for age, sex, and levels fused produced balanced cohorts. Results: In total, 247 CBT fusions were analyzed: 28 (11.3%) freehand and 219 (88.7%) PSI. After the introduction of PSI, annual CBT volume increased from roughly 7 to 55 cases. Matched comparisons showed that PSI reduced mean operative time by about 33 minutes (149.5 vs. 182.5 minutes,
conclusionsUse of PSI in CBT lumbar fusion shortened operations, reduced blood loss, and maintained safety, while allowing the surgeon to perform more cases with greater consistency. The results suggest PSI smooths the CBT learning curve and may offer practical cost savings through improved operating-room efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.