Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333262›Full record

ArticleARYA atherosclerosis2026

Endovascular stenting for coarctation of the aorta in Infants and young children in southeast Iran: A retrospective study.

Fatemeh Doost-Mohammadi, Reza Derakhshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ARYA atherosclerosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh Doost-MohammadiClinical Research Development Unit, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Reza DerakhshanDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoarctation of the aorta (CoA) in infants and young children is typically treated with high-risk open-heart surgery. Endovascular stenting provides a less invasive alternative; however, its safety and efficacy remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate procedural success, complications, and four-year outcomes of stenting for CoA.

methodsA retrospective review included 30 infants and young children (28 days to 3 years of age, weight >2.5 kg) with CoA who underwent endovascular stenting in Kerman and Sistan-Baluchestan, Iran, from 2024 to 2025. Patients with complex heart defects requiring immediate surgery or weighing <2.5 kg were excluded. Diagnostics utilized echocardiography, femoral angiography (for gradient assessment), and CT angiography. Outcomes included reduction in gradient,

resultsProcedural success was achieved in 27 out of 30 patients (90%, 95% CI: 73.5-97.9%). The mean gradient was reduced by 89% (from 45 ± 10 mmHg to 5 ± 3 mmHg, p<0.001). Minor complications occurred in 3 of 30 patients (10%; 95% CI: 2.1-26.5%), including 2 hematomas and 1 transient arrhythmia; no major complications or mortality were reported. Four-year stent patency was 90% (95% CI: 73.5-97.9%); 3 out of 30 patients (10%) required re-dilation at 2.5 years due to growth. Cox regression analysis found no predictors for re-intervention (p>0.05).

conclusionEndovascular stenting seems to be a safe and effective alternative for CoA in infants and young children. Larger prospective studies are necessary.

Indexed as

ChildrenCoarctation of the AortaCongenital Heart DiseaseEndovascular StentingInfantsLong-Term OutcomesVascular Intervention

Identifiers

PMID42333262
PMCPMC13283337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.