ArticleArchives animal breeding2025
Genomic prediction in a backcross population using relationship matrices.
Article in Archives animal breeding, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backcrossing is a widely used crossbreeding strategy for transferring desirable traits from a donor line into a recurrent parent population. Although genomic selection can accelerate genetic improvement in these populations, traditional models such as G-BLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) often assume marker independence and uniform variance contributions - simplifications that can affect the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). To address these shortcomings, we developed three models: covariance-adjusted genomic BLUP (CAG-BLUP), which accounts for correlated markers, and two genomic-architecture-specific BLUP variants (GASI-BLUP for independent markers and GASC-BLUP for correlated markers), both assuming unequal variance contributions. Evaluated against the conventional G-BLUP using simulated and empirical mouse datasets, these models demonstrated superior performance in predicting GEBVs and in capturing genetic-architecture nuances. Specifically, GASI-BLUP significantly outperformed G-BLUP in scenarios involving independent quantitative trait loci (QTLs), improving GEBV prediction accuracy by up to 12 % and reducing underestimation of genetic variance by 12 %-34 %. CAG-BLUP showed enhanced performance in dependent QTL scenarios, particularly at lower heritabilities, with an improvement of up to 2 % in GEBV accuracy. These findings highlight the importance of selecting genomic prediction models tailored to the specific genetic architecture of traits to enhance prediction accuracy. By doing so, we pave the way for more effective breeding programs, promising substantial genetic improvements and contributing to the overarching goal of bolstering global food security. Future research will focus on expanding these models to incorporate non-additive genetic effects and on testing their applicability across different species and breeding contexts, aiming to further refine genomic prediction methodologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.