ArticleJAMIA open2026
Understanding uncertainty in large language model predictions of early death in critically ill patients: a conformal prediction approach.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early prediction of in-hospital death remains a significant challenge due to the limited availability of structured data during initial admission. Unstructured clinical notes, which often contain important observations and impressions, are an underutilized resource for real-time risk stratification. While leveraging recent advances in large language models (LLMs) is a promising approach to use this unstructured information, the lack of understanding of the uncertainty of LLM predictions, at the patient level, for such critical forecasts is a serious deterrence for their use in clinical settings. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate the use of conformal prediction to evaluate the effectiveness and confidence in predicting in-hospital death probability for an individual patient using LLMs, specifically GPT-4o and unstructured clinical notes. Methods: We applied conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of GPT-4o's zero-shot predictions for in-hospital death, leveraging concatenated clinical notes documented from the first 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in MIMIC-III for patients with acute kidney failure who were admitted through the emergency department (ED). Results: Across both classes "in-hospital death" and "in-hospital survive," the GPT model performed better on the in-hospital death class, achieving precision of 0.52 (95% CI 0.48-0.56), recall of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95), and F1-score 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.70). The conformal prediction (CP) framework provided an overall empirical coverage of 90.4%, exceeding the target threshold of 90%. However, class-specific coverage was imbalanced, with 99.7% for the death and 81.1% for the survived class. Conclusions: The model's outputs exhibit overconfidence, particularly in cases of incorrect predictions. Integrating conformal prediction provides a promising approach to quantifying and calibrating uncertainty in large language model outputs for individual patient predictions, thereby enhancing their potential applicability for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.