Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333225›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

The enigmatic historical record of the leaf beetle

Adrián Sánchez Albert, José Antonio López-Sáez, Inés Modolell, Peter Lawrence, Mercedes París

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrián Sánchez AlbertEntomology Collection, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio López-SáezEnvironmental Archaeology Research Group, Institute of History (CCHS-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
Inés ModolellCambridge University Hospitals (CUH) Foundation Trust, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter LawrenceDepartment of Zoology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mercedes ParísEntomology Collection, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Natural History Collections (NHC) often contain exceptional specimens documenting unusual historical events, and these records can be valuable for detecting overlooked biological introductions. Here, we examine a striking case: a Neotropical leaf beetle, Methods: We reconstructed the circumstances of the collection event using the collector's personal archives. We conducted scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to document microscopic particles on the specimen's cuticle. We also analysed the content of the original specimen box to evaluate the likelihood of pollen cross-contamination, considering the geographical origin and family-level identity of all co-stored specimens. Results: Archival evidence confirms the collector's presence at the labelled locality and date. SEM revealed several pollen grains consistent with plant taxa occurring at the collection site. However, the original box also contained numerous Spanish specimens belonging to beetle families with known anthophilous habits, meaning that cross-contamination during storage cannot be fully excluded. As a result, the palynological evidence remains inconclusive. Conclusions: Together, the available evidence makes a failed historical introduction a plausible scenario, yet the inconclusive particle analysis prevents any confident confirmation. This case highlights both the potential and the limitations of NHC-derived data in invasion biology: while museum collections can preserve traces of otherwise "invisible" introductions, interpreting isolated and context-poor specimens remains inherently uncertain.

Indexed as

ColeopteraAnimalsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNatural HistoryPollenSpainAcentroptera norrisiiBiological introductionCassidinaeChrysomelidaeColeopteraHistorical palynologyMislabellingMuseum specimenSEM analysisSpain

Identifiers

PMID42333225
PMCPMC13283361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.