ArticlePeerJ2026
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese revised Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests in children with amblyopia.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with amblyopia commonly present with sensory integration difficulties, however, there is a paucity of validated tools to assess these issues in this clinical population. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese Revised version of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT-R) for use in children with amblyopia. Methods: We conducted a psychometric validation study using baseline data from the China Amblyopia Behavioral Cohort (CABC). Participants included 629 children aged 4-9 years diagnosed with amblyopia; subtypes included bilateral ametropic (55.7%), anisometropic (38.8%), and strabismic amblyopia (5.6%). Based on severity, 32.1% were classified as mild amblyopia, 59.3% as moderate amblyopia, and 8.6% as severe. Because the learning ability subscale was only applicable to children aged 6 years and older, scale structure differed between age groups. Thus, reliability and validity were evaluated separately for the aged 4-5 and 6-9 years. Internal consistency and construct validity were examined Results: The SIPT-R demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.968 - 0.969) and strong subscale reliability (α = 0.906 - 0.959). All split-half coefficients exceeded 0.80. CFA indicated an acceptable model fit for both age groups: for aged 4-5 years, Conclusions: The Chinese revised SIPT-R demonstrates strong reliability and acceptable validity for screening sensory integration function in children with amblyopia. Further research should focus on refining specific subscales and evaluating additional psychometric properties, such as test-retest reliability and criterion validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.