ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Emergency Appendectomy during the Early Phase after
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old man with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and multiple liver metastases underwent PRRT at another institution. Six days after treatment, he developed acute appendicitis and was referred to our hospital. Laboratory findings showed leukocytosis and elevated inflammatory markers. Emergency laparoscopic appendectomy was performed, and intraoperative radiation dose rates were measured using a survey meter. At a distance of 1 m from the patient, radiation levels were low (1.1 μSv/h), while measurements at 20 cm from the operative field ranged from 8.4 to 12.2 μSv/h, remaining within acceptable safety limits. Radiation levels detected in urine were also low (0.2 μSv/h at 5 cm). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on POD 4 without complications.
conclusionsThis case demonstrates that emergency surgery can be performed safely during the early phase after PRRT when appropriate radiation safety precautions are implemented. Radiation exposure to surgical staff remained minimal at typical working distances, and even near-field exposure was within acceptable limits. Urgent surgical intervention should not be unnecessarily delayed following PRRT when clinically indicated, provided that appropriate monitoring and precautions are in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.